“Volley’s innovative technology to ingest, integrate and target micro-learning content automatically can fundamentally transform the way firms like ours approach learning and knowledge management,” Joseph Infozino, head of learning platforms at JPMorgan Chase, said in a statement.New York-based JPMorgan takes equity stakes in young technology companies that can help the bank enhance customer experience, become more efficient and protect its assets..Volley’s investors also include Zuckerberg Education Ventures, a fund investing on behalf of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, as well as former global co-heads of technology at Goldman Sachs Group Paul Walker and Don Duet.The startup is developing software that can process data from disparate sources to create quizzes and other corporate training material such as cybersecurity or compliance courses.The companies declined to disclose the size of the investment, but China lithium battery leaf blowers Manufacturers Volley said it will use the funding to double its team of less than 20 over the next nine months.Its technology can help large companies, including banks, save money and time when creating educational content for employees, Volley founder and chief technology officer Carson Kahn said in an interview.“Volley is tackling and solving one of the most difficult and important problems in machine learning: extracting knowledge from unstructured information,” Walker said.JPMorgan Chase has made a strategic investment in Volley.Volley had initially focused on developing an app for students that used its machine learning engine, but later pivoted to developing technology for enterprises, Kahn added.com, a San Francisco-based startup that uses artificial intelligence to help large enterprises automatically generate training content for employees, the companies said on Tuesday.JPMorgan’s investment comes as banks increasingly look to use artificial intelligence to make better use of the growing amount of data that they hold across a variety of business lines, ranging from trading to compliance.Walker, also a senior advisor at Volley, said in an interview that the company’s technology could help augment people’s ability to learn by identifying their knowledge gaps and creating personalised content.

Megosztás a facebookon

You can have potentially very destabilising situations where people are reported as saying something they never said,” he said.Artificial intelligence has a new challenge: Whether and how to alert people who may not know they’re talking to a robot.One co-owner of a San Francisco Bay Area barbershop patronised by some Google employees was a little creeped out by the privacy implications.“That’s very impressive, but it can clearly lead to more sinister uses of this type of technology,” said Matthew Fenech, who researches the policy implications of AI for the London-based organisation Future Advocacy.“It seems like something that would be helpful for our clients,” said Katherine Esperanza, co-owner of the Slick and Dapper barbershop in Oakland, California. But the real people in those calls didn’t seem to be aware they were talking to a machine.“It’s important to us that users and businesses have a good experience with this service, and transparency is a key part of that,” Google engineers Yaniv Leviathan and Yossi Matias, who helped design the new technology, wrote in a blog post.”It’s unclear how the company will navigate existing telecommunications laws, which can vary by state or country. “We want to be clear about the intent of the call so businesses understand the context.Among them: Is it fair — or even legal China Lithium Battery Hedge Trimmer — to trick people into talking to an AI system that effectively records all of its conversations?

And while Google’s demonstration highlighted the benign uses of conversational robots, what happens when spammers and scammers get hold of them?Google CEO Sundar Pichai elicited cheers as he demonstrated the new technology, called Duplex, during the company’s annual conference for software developers.Pichai and other Google executives tried to emphasise that the technology is still experimental, and will be rolled out cautiously. It’s not yet available on consumer devices.. Google didn’t return a request for comment on how it plans to seek the consent of people called by its bots. The assistant added pauses, “ums” and “mmm-hmms” to its speech in order to sound more human as it spoke with real employees at a hair salon and a restaurant. Esperanza, however, wondered if the shop would be able to block the calls, and said it “begs the question about whether the conversation is recorded and if the recipient of these automated calls could be aware that they’re being recorded.At Google I/O 2018, the company showed off a computer assistant that makes convincingly human-sounding phone calls, at least in its pre-recorded demonstration.”

Fenech said it’s not hard to imagine nefarious uses of similar chatbots, such as spamming businesses, scamming seniors or making malicious calls using the voices of political or personal enemies. We’ll be experimenting with the right approach over the coming months. “The ability to pick up on nuance, the human uses of additional small phrases — these sorts of cues are very human, and clearly the person on the other end didn’t know.”Anti-wiretapping laws in California and several other states already make it illegal to record phone calls without the consent of both the caller and the person being called. The Federal Communications Commission has also been grappling with rules for robocalls, the unsolicited and automatically-dialed calls made by telemarketers.Such calls are typically prerecorded monologues, but more businesses and organisations are employing machine-learning techniques to respond to a person’s questions with a natural-sounding conversation, in hopes they’ll be less likely to hang up. That could present thorny issues for the future use of AI.

Megosztás a facebookon

”Kaspersky is currently banned on computers used by US government on claims that lithium battery lawn mowers Factory the company helped Russian spies’ attacks against American targets.As per the antivirus policy, infected files were uploaded to Kaspersky for analysis. Reports say that the Kaspersky Antivirus, which was installed on the system, was disabled manually in order to activate the pirated copy of Microsoft Office. The malware consisted of a full-blown backdoor which could have allowed other third-parties to access the user’s machine,” the Company said.According to Softpedia, the user downloaded and installed a pirated copy of Microsoft Office 2013 and used a key generator to bypass the activation process.Kaspersky said that the malware was controlled from a computer server based in China and would have opened a path into the computer for anyone targeting an NSA worker. The user was infected with this malware for an unspecified period while the Kaspersky Lab product was inactive.The company claimed that the computer was infected by other malware, including a Russian-made ‘backdoor tool,’ which was hidden in a pirated copy of Microsoft Office. The computer security firm has accused the malware infected software of Microsoft, the reason for the NSA hack and theft of top-secret US intelligence materials.Talking about the software that facilitated the hack, Kaspersky says it wasn’t the antivirus software that allowed cybercriminals to breach into the system but pirated Microsoft software.Kaspersky has recently published the results of its investigation following claims that its antivirus software was used in an attack aimed at an NSA employee. Once the classified docs were discovered the infected file was deleted for which Kaspersky says the “archive was not shared with any third parties. This detection took place on October 4, 2014.The company says some of NSA’s files ended up on its servers after the antivirus system detected a 7Zip archive file infected with the malware.Earlier reports indicated that Kaspersky’s antivirus software, which was running on the NSA worker’s home computer, is believed to be the reason behind the Russian spies to access the machine and steal important documents which belonged to NSA hacking unit dubbed as Equation Group.“The illegal activation tool contained within the Office ISO was infected with malware.

Megosztás a facebookon

China has a powerful military machine, of which it appears too proud. He spoke of his country’s tactical nuclear weapons to take on India in the context of India’s “Cold Start” doctrine and its claim of two-front war capability. The remarks should remind our neighbours and the wider region, that India is adequately placed to protect its interests even in the event of a two-front military conflagration, which, he said, he did not foresee any time soon.About a fortnight ago, Pakistan Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi had done some showing off when he was in New York for the UN session. The Indian Air Chief noted, perhaps keeping this in mind while answering a journalist’s question, that Indian Air Force can “locate, fix, and destroy” Pakistan’s nuclear capabilities (and other assets) according to India’s nuclear doctrine. Air Chief Dhanoa brought a sense of realism to bear when he noted that the existing two-front capability of the Indian Air Force does take into account China’s lethal power in the Tibetan plateau.S. It also possesses a force of unguided missiles in the shape of full-fledged terrorist irregulars.

Air Chief Marshal B. He has made it clear that he does not see fighting ahead, but was only speaking of capabilities and preparations in the context of potential threats. Dhanoa’s observations on Thursday, just ahead of Air Force Day, are well-timed. In Pakistan’s case, it has been empty rhetoric all the way. Our misguided neighbour has sought to exploit a condition of nuclear overhang to conduct a proxy war against us, which is the best it can muster.Although war is nowhere on the horizon, after the Indian “surgical strike” in September last year, Pakistani military and civilian leaders needlessly went into overdrive on belligerence, strutting their military status. In the circumstances, it sometimes becomes necessary to explicate the overall balance China Lithium Battery Accessories to all concerned.

The articulations should also help to lower tensions.. Bipin Rawat at the height of the Doklam standoff with China, who had asserted that the Indian forces were perfectly capable of a two-front war.The Air Force chief’s comments may be seen in consonance with the remarks of Army Chief Gen.China too, in order to provide political solace to its “all-weather friend”, pitches in from time to time, as during the Doklam crisis, with heroic praise of its military machine in relation to India.In the overall circumstances, Air Chief Dhanoa has sought to bring a sense of proportion to the table.Henry Kissinger once said that India’s neighbourhood was one of the most dangerous in the world.Pakistan is unstable and poorly led. India’s air power needs to possess greater lethality and it needs greater positioning than is the case at present, specially when seen in the context of protection of our incipient blue-water naval assets.

Megosztás a facebookon